| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs i7-4702MQ


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-H
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
45 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
145.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
18.98k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
9.5k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
4.32k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
3.99k (x0.62)
TOTAL
50.54k
36.8k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
74.75k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
47.72k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
19.65k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
3.02k (x0.62)
TOTAL
205.24k
145.15k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4