Core i7-6700HQ vs i5-3320M
Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 145.7 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 2.5 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 145.7 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 2.5 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-H
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
58.81k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
10.64k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.98k
10.53k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.07k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
3.97k (x0.56)
TOTAL
39.49k
29.22k (x0.74)
Multithread
i7-6700HQ
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
44.59k
21.27k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
75.02k
23.93k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.15k
9.48k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
4.12k (x0.7)
TOTAL
145.68k
58.81k (x0.4)
Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
991 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
3237 points/W
1680 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3208 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4853 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2021 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
11284 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4