| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
90675
Core
Skylake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
399.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
24.24k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
16.98k
24.74k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
13.95k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
14.47k (x2.05)
TOTAL
39.49k
77.41k (x1.96)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
44.59k
126.87k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
75.02k
186.48k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.15k
92.37k (x4.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
15.45k (x2.61)
TOTAL
145.68k
421.18k (x2.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
33.85k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
20.33k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
10.51k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
11.77k (x1.83)
TOTAL
50.54k
76.46k (x1.51)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
174.21k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
141.31k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
64.86k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
19.01k (x3.9)
TOTAL
205.24k
399.39k (x1.95)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4