| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
Both models i7-6700 and 4110 are based on Skylake architecture.

Sky Lake is also known as 6th generation Core. Include Thunderbolt 3.0, SATA Express and Iris Pro graphics with DirectX 12. It uses LGA 1151 socket for mainstream models and LGA 2066 for X-Series. Sky Lake comes with AVX2 support in all mainstreams CPUs and AVX-512 in some high end models.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
50654
Core
Skylake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2015
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
18.78k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
16.25k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
3.99k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
6.8k (x1.11)
TOTAL
57.76k
45.82k (x0.79)

Multithread

i7-6700

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
133.55k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
108.43k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
30.02k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
9.48k (x1.46)
TOTAL
243.4k
281.48k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i7-6700
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4