Core i7-6700 vs i5-8265U
Description
The i7-6700 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
806eb
Core
Skylake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2015
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
24.32k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
20.35k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.38k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
8.52k (x1.39)
TOTAL
57.76k
57.57k (x1)
Multithread
i7-6700
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
65.17k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
63.6k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
14.4k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
6.31k (x0.97)
TOTAL
243.4k
149.48k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i7-6700
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4