| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i7-6700 is based on Skylake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2015
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
22.16k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
24.46k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
10.71k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
22.44k (x3.65)
TOTAL
57.76k
79.76k (x1.38)

Multithread

i7-6700

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
112.5k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
153.92k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
67.75k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
11.47k (x1.76)
TOTAL
243.4k
345.64k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i7-6700
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4