Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i7-6700 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.7 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700 gets a score of 243.4 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.7 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2015
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.76k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.4k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.83k
13.25k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
21.67k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.79k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.14k
3.98k (x0.65)
TOTAL
57.76k
43.7k (x0.76)
Multithread
i7-6700
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
109.79k
46.47k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
78.38k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.72k
16.69k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
3.3k (x0.51)
TOTAL
243.4k
144.84k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i7-6700
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1689 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1575 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
3745 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6206 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5456 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1535 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4