| | | | | | |

Core i7-6560U vs i3-9100T


Description
The i7-6560U is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6560U gets a score of 107 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.8 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
906eb
Core
Skylake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.96k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
107.01k points
192.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6560U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.29k
3.79k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
13.52k
15.65k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
4.59k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
7.78k (x1.1)
TOTAL
28.14k
31.81k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-6560U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.49k
13.97k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
31.11k
57.83k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.25k
17.03k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
4.35k (x0.71)
TOTAL
54.01k
93.18k (x1.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6560U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.21k
24.89k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.25k
21.82k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.83k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.09k
8.63k (x1.22)
TOTAL
52.96k
60.16k (x1.14)

Multithread

i7-6560U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
44.94k
89.4k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
44.98k
81.19k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
18.06k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.26k
4.24k (x0.68)
TOTAL
107.01k
192.88k (x1.8)

Performance/W
i7-6560U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2996 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2998 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
722 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
418 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
7134 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6560U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6941 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6017 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2214 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
16550 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4