| | | | | | |

Core i7-5820K vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 137.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.2 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0653
Core
Haswell-E
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
140 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
4.3k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
16.56k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
5.25k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
12.61k (x3.34)
TOTAL
21.53k
38.72k (x1.8)

Multithread

i7-5820K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
18.1k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
79.16k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
26.75k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
13.81k (x1.72)
TOTAL
117.38k
137.82k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i7-5820K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
278 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
459 points/W
1218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
412 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
212 points/W
TOTAL
838 points/W
2120 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1062 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2678 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1050 points/GHz
2933 points/GHz
TOTAL
5981 points/GHz
9005 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4