Core i7-5820K vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 117.4 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-E
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
140 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
175.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3.78k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
16.42k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.75k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
5.51k (x1.46)
TOTAL
21.53k
30.46k (x1.41)
Multithread
i7-5820K
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
15.18k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
74.87k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
27.85k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
6.08k (x0.76)
TOTAL
117.38k
123.97k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
459 points/W
2139 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
838 points/W
3542 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1062 points/GHz
945 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2678 points/GHz
4105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1050 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
TOTAL
5981 points/GHz
7615 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4