Core i7-5820K vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.6 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.6 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
610f31
Core
Haswell-E
Richland
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
140 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
kB
Date
September 2014
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
9.53k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
8.14k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.45k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
3.48k (x0.94)
TOTAL
31.53k
24.6k (x0.78)
Multithread
i7-5820K
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
18.2k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
19.33k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
8.42k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
3.86k (x0.5)
TOTAL
129.06k
49.8k (x0.39)
Performance/W
i7-5820K
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4