| | | | | | |

Core i7-5820K vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i7-5820K is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-5820K gets a score of 129.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806c1
Core
Haswell-E
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
140 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.53k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
129.06k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-5820K
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.82k
3.75k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
17.22k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
9.79k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.78k
8.21k (x2.17)
TOTAL
21.53k
38.97k (x1.81)

Multithread

i7-5820K

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.07k
9.19k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
64.25k
35.47k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
19.14k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
5.82k (x0.72)
TOTAL
117.38k
69.62k (x0.59)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-5820K
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.03k
14.65k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
11.23k
21.57k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
9.93k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
8.02k (x2.16)
TOTAL
31.53k
54.18k (x1.72)

Multithread

i7-5820K

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
49.48k
32.14k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
52.21k
43.54k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.7k
19.58k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.67k
5.61k (x0.73)
TOTAL
129.06k
100.87k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i7-5820K
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
353 points/W
1148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
373 points/W
1555 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
699 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
200 points/W
TOTAL
922 points/W
3602 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-5820K
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3119 points/GHz
5262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1956 points/GHz
TOTAL
8759 points/GHz
13214 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4