Core i7-4820K vs i5-8250U
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-8250U gets 137.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i5-8250U gets 137.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
806ea
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
54.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
161.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
12.59k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
18.89k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.65k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
8.2k (x1.99)
TOTAL
32.49k
44.32k (x1.36)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
45.91k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
69.55k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
16.79k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
4.83k (x0.48)
TOTAL
134.08k
137.09k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
3061 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
4637 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
9139 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3702 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5556 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
13036 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4