Core i7-4820K vs i3-9100
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906eb
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
229.2k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
14.81k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
22.15k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.42k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.8k (x1.17)
TOTAL
32.49k
47.17k (x1.45)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
52.08k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
87.45k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
20.98k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
4.24k (x0.42)
TOTAL
134.08k
164.75k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
801 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
323 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
65 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
2535 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5274 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
1289 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
1143 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
11232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4