Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the 5800X gets 479 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.6 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the 5800X gets 479 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.6 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a20f12
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
130 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2013
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
89.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
558.41k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
18.1k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
26.41k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
12.39k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
26.06k (x6.33)
TOTAL
32.49k
82.95k (x2.55)
Multithread
i7-4820K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
125.9k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
233.26k (x4.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
109.66k (x5.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
10.21k (x1.02)
TOTAL
134.08k
479.02k (x3.57)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
1199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
2221 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
97 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
4562 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3851 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5619 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
2635 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
17649 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4