Core i7-4820K vs i7-1165G7
Description
The i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4820K gets a score of 134.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
806c1
Core
Ivy Bridge -E
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.49k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.08k points
210.4k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4820K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.85k
16.27k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
11.84k
25.74k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
11.5k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
10.82k (x2.63)
TOTAL
32.49k
64.32k (x1.98)
Multithread
i7-4820K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
47.65k
54k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
54.81k
88.76k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
35.23k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
12.14k (x1.21)
TOTAL
134.08k
190.12k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i7-4820K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
367 points/W
1928 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
422 points/W
3170 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
434 points/W
TOTAL
1031 points/W
6790 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4820K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3039 points/GHz
3462 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3035 points/GHz
5476 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1201 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1056 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
TOTAL
8331 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4