Core i7-4790K vs i5-10200H
Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0652
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
88 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.47k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
215.47k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.16k
26.37k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.78k
23.91k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
5.57k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
11.68k (x2.12)
TOTAL
52.47k
67.53k (x1.29)
Multithread
i7-4790K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
107.76k
114.08k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
70.84k
114.71k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.99k
27.33k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
4.25k (x0.48)
TOTAL
215.47k
260.38k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i7-4790K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1225 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
805 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2448 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
5946 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3359 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1254 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
11925 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4