Core i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 1.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 215.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 1.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
88 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.47k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
215.47k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.16k
14.58k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
14.78k
23.98k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
5.35k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.52k
6.34k (x1.15)
TOTAL
52.47k
50.25k (x0.96)
Multithread
i7-4790K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
107.76k
57.37k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
70.84k
107.03k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.99k
28.9k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
7.05k (x0.79)
TOTAL
215.47k
200.34k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i7-4790K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1225 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
805 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2448 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5946 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3359 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1254 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
11925 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4