| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs m3-7Y30


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 2.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
52.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
10.02k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
9.22k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
2.04k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
4.31k (x1.3)
TOTAL
31.31k
25.6k (x0.82)

Multithread

i7-4765T

m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
21.75k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
20.51k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
4.97k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
5.56k (x0.71)
TOTAL
134.53k
52.78k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
11730 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4