Core i7-4765T vs i5-8265U
Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806eb
Core
Haswell
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
24.32k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
20.35k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.38k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
8.52k (x2.56)
TOTAL
31.31k
57.57k (x1.84)
Multithread
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
65.17k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
63.6k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
14.4k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
6.31k (x0.8)
TOTAL
134.53k
149.48k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4