| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
168.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
21.65k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
19.18k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.38k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
8.3k (x2.49)
TOTAL
31.31k
53.51k (x1.71)

Multithread

i7-4765T

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
77.12k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
68.68k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
15.24k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
7.78k (x0.99)
TOTAL
134.53k
168.81k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4