| | | | | | |

Core i7-4765T vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
860f81
Core
Haswell
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
15.09k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
23.74k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
8.32k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
5.19k (x1.56)
TOTAL
31.31k
52.35k (x1.67)

Multithread

i7-4765T

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
67k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
89.94k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
36.84k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
4.6k (x0.58)
TOTAL
134.53k
198.38k (x1.47)

Performance/W
i7-4765T
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4