Core i7-4765T vs A12 9800
Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.3 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.3 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
660f51
Core
Haswell
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
May 2013
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
13.42k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
17.61k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.77k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.06k (x0.92)
TOTAL
31.31k
37.86k (x1.21)
Multithread
i7-4765T
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
40.46k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
43.18k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
12.78k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
4.37k (x0.55)
TOTAL
134.53k
100.79k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i7-4765T
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4