Core i7-4765T vs i5-11400
Description
The i7-4765T is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4765T gets a score of 134.5 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0671
Core
Haswell
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
134.53k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4765T
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
31.23k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
25.88k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
10.83k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
18.17k (x5.46)
TOTAL
31.31k
86.11k (x2.75)
Multithread
i7-4765T
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
66k
213.85k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
43.27k
195.51k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.39k
72.06k (x4.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
7.89k (x1)
TOTAL
134.53k
489.31k (x3.64)
Performance/W
i7-4765T
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1236 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
497 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3844 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4765T
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
5203 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2932 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1110 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
10438 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4