| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
47 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
4.3k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
16.56k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
5.25k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
12.61k (x3.35)
TOTAL
21.53k
38.72k (x1.8)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
18.1k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
37.71k
79.16k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
26.75k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.94k
13.81k (x2.32)
TOTAL
71.69k
137.82k (x1.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
26.28k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
23.38k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.52k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
12.96k (x3.02)
TOTAL
40.12k
68.14k (x1.7)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
163.67k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
159.74k (x3.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
39k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
7.56k (x1.29)
TOTAL
132.35k
369.97k (x2.8)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4