Core i7-4720HQ vs i3-10100
Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
47 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
22.74k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
20.31k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
4.71k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
7.65k (x1.78)
TOTAL
40.12k
55.41k (x1.38)
Multithread
i7-4720HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
71.95k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
67.7k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
16.43k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
6.25k (x1.06)
TOTAL
132.35k
162.33k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4