Core i7-4720HQ vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2015
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
13.25k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
21.67k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
4.79k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
3.98k (x0.93)
TOTAL
40.12k
43.7k (x1.09)
Multithread
i7-4720HQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
46.47k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
78.38k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
16.69k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
3.3k (x0.56)
TOTAL
132.35k
144.84k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4