| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs i7-6600U


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i7-6600U gets 79.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 2 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
406e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
79.22k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
16.72k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
14.7k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
3.4k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
4.9k (x1.1)
TOTAL
40.65k
39.73k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
33.41k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
31.66k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
8.18k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5.97k (x1.23)
TOTAL
155.24k
79.22k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
546 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
398 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
5282 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
11684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4