Core i7-4710HQ vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.1 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.1 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
140.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
10.88k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
18.09k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.29k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
3.36k (x0.76)
TOTAL
40.65k
36.64k (x0.9)
Multithread
i7-4710HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
42.44k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
73.82k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
20.76k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.96k (x0.82)
TOTAL
155.24k
140.97k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4