Core i7-4710HQ vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 2 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 2 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Dali
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
9.33k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
17.1k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
3.57k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
3.26k (x0.73)
TOTAL
40.65k
33.26k (x0.82)
Multithread
i7-4710HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
22.14k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
40.04k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
10.71k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5k (x1.03)
TOTAL
155.24k
77.88k (x0.5)
Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4