| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.6 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
90675
Core
Haswell
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4 /4
6/12
TDP
47 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
33.85k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
20.33k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
10.51k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
11.77k (x2.65)
TOTAL
40.65k
76.46k (x1.88)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
174.21k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
141.31k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
64.86k (x3.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
19.01k (x3.92)
TOTAL
155.24k
399.39k (x2.57)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4