Core i7-4702MQ vs Pentium N3540
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the N3540 gets 21.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 3.5 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the N3540 gets 21.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 3.5 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
30678
Core
Haswell
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
37 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
May 2013
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
37.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
1.37k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
1.95k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.21k (x0.35)
TOTAL
19.47k
6.53k (x0.34)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
5.24k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
7.69k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
7.31k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
1.52k (x0.42)
TOTAL
75.92k
21.76k (x0.29)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
749 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
1098 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
1045 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
3109 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
515 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
749 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
455 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
2448 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4