Core i7-4702MQ vs i5-9300H
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ed
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
37 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
61.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
187.98k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
24.7k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
21.5k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
4.87k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
9.99k (x2.5)
TOTAL
36.8k
61.06k (x1.66)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
85.56k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
76.43k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
19.35k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
6.63k (x2.2)
TOTAL
145.15k
187.98k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
430 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
4177 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
6023 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
5245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
2437 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
14893 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4