Core i7-4702MQ vs i5-8350U
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
37 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
112.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
16.74k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
14.66k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
2.79k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
4.12k (x1.03)
TOTAL
36.8k
38.31k (x1.04)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
51.05k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
45.59k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
10.69k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
4.78k (x1.58)
TOTAL
145.15k
112.12k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
7475 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4