| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
37 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
13.77k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
22.62k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
4.91k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
4k (x1)
TOTAL
36.8k
45.3k (x1.23)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
50.44k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
94k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
25.64k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
4.11k (x1.36)
TOTAL
145.15k
174.19k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4