Core i7-4702MQ vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.3 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.3 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
100fa0
Core
Haswell
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/6
TDP
37 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
1.98k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
4.57k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.57k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.51k (x1)
TOTAL
19.47k
12.64k (x0.65)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
11.86k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
27.4k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
15.39k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.46k (x0.96)
TOTAL
75.92k
58.11k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
612 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4