| | | | | | |

Core i7-4600U vs Athlon X4 950


Description
The i7-4600U is based on Haswell architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 950 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
660f51
Core
Haswell
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
28.98k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.55k points
99.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4600U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
12.44k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
8.31k
15.96k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
3.54k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
3k (x1.01)
TOTAL
28.98k
34.93k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-4600U

950
Test#1 (Integers)
31.32k
40.75k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
20.17k
42.07k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.02k
12.53k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.03k
4.45k (x0.88)
TOTAL
64.55k
99.8k (x1.55)

Performance/W
i7-4600U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
2088 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
4303 points/W
1535 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4600U
950
Test#1 (Integers)
4353 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
896 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
8781 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4