Core i7-4500U vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i7-4500U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4500U gets a score of 53.4 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.5 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4500U gets a score of 53.4 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.5 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
206d7
Core
Haswell
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.02k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.14k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
10.41k
8.76k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
8.97k
7.35k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.82k
3.86k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
3.32k (x0.98)
TOTAL
26.59k
23.28k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-4500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
19.91k
78.51k (x3.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.47k
66.46k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.53k
36.42k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.53k
3.88k (x1.1)
TOTAL
53.44k
185.26k (x3.47)
Performance/W
i7-4500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1327 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1431 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
569 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
3563 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2990 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
8863 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4