Core i7-4500U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-4500U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4500U gets a score of 66.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 5.3 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4500U gets a score of 66.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 5.3 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
870f10
Core
Haswell
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
June 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.02k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.14k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.31k
4.2k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
8.37k
17.36k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.68k
7.5k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.34k
23.79k (x7.12)
TOTAL
18.71k
52.85k (x2.82)
Multithread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.21k
22.11k (x4.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.54k
108.04k (x5.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
56.81k (x7.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.54k
36.39k (x10.27)
TOTAL
35.09k
223.36k (x6.36)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
10.2k
15.38k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
9.23k
21.94k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
7.97k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
24.76k (x7.52)
TOTAL
26.61k
70.05k (x2.63)
Multithread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
19.2k
96.91k (x5.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.02k
135.12k (x7.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.31k
70.39k (x8.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.22k
56.43k (x17.51)
TOTAL
49.75k
358.85k (x7.21)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
10.41k
15.04k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
8.97k
20.95k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.82k
8.57k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
21.71k (x6.41)
TOTAL
26.59k
66.27k (x2.49)
Multithread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
19.91k
94.36k (x4.74)
Test#2 (FP)
21.47k
141.73k (x6.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.53k
69.38k (x8.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.53k
32.72k (x9.27)
TOTAL
53.44k
338.19k (x6.33)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.67k
16.04k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
9k
24.47k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
8.38k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
21.66k (x6.02)
TOTAL
33.02k
70.55k (x2.14)
Multithread
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
31.77k
113.63k (x3.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.36k
143.55k (x6.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.95k
63.84k (x8.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
27.34k (x5.4)
TOTAL
66.14k
348.35k (x5.27)
Performance/W
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2118 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1424 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
530 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4410 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4500U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5558 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3001 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1250 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1199 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
11008 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4