Core i7-3930K vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i7-3930K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3930K gets a score of 155.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3930K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3930K gets a score of 155.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3930K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
406f1
Core
Sandy Bridge-E
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
130 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
November 2011
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.76k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.86k points
237.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3930K
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
6.04k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
9.06k
10.18k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.45k
2.74k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.16k
2.41k (x0.58)
TOTAL
27.76k
21.37k (x0.77)
Multithread
i7-3930K
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
62.22k
47.51k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
60.25k
75.12k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.42k
19.72k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
5.45k (x1.83)
TOTAL
155.86k
147.8k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-3930K
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
463 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
234 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1199 points/W
1739 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3930K
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2653 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
7304 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4