| | | | | | |

Core i7-3930K vs i5-10500T


Description
The i7-3930K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3930K gets a score of 155.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 233.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.5 times faster than the i7-3930K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge-E
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.76k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.86k points
302.13k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3930K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
14.01k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
9.06k
21.17k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.45k
5.21k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.16k
11.42k (x2.74)
TOTAL
27.76k
51.82k (x1.87)

Multithread

i7-3930K

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
62.22k
82.38k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
60.25k
115.64k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.42k
32.22k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
3.71k (x1.25)
TOTAL
155.86k
233.94k (x1.5)

Performance/W
i7-3930K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
463 points/W
3304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
234 points/W
921 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
1199 points/W
6684 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3930K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2653 points/GHz
3687 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
5571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
3005 points/GHz
TOTAL
7304 points/GHz
13636 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4