Core i7-3930K vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i7-3930K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3930K gets a score of 155.9 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-3930K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3930K gets a score of 155.9 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-3930K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
810f10
Core
Sandy Bridge-E
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.76k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.86k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3930K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
13.04k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
9.06k
22.35k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.45k
5.37k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.16k
3.4k (x0.82)
TOTAL
27.76k
44.15k (x1.59)
Multithread
i7-3930K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
62.22k
56.49k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
60.25k
100.74k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.42k
28.21k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
3.04k (x1.02)
TOTAL
155.86k
188.49k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i7-3930K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
463 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
234 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1199 points/W
2900 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3930K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2653 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
7304 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4