| | | | | | |

Core i7-3770K vs i5-10500T


Description
The i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 133.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 233.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.7 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
77 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.19k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.88k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-3770K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.86k
3.87k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.79k
15.79k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
5.1k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
12.13k (x2.2)
TOTAL
25.06k
36.89k (x1.47)

Multithread

i7-3770K

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
22.17k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
46.25k
101.79k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.67k
34.13k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.36k
3.74k (x0.36)
TOTAL
97.44k
161.83k (x1.66)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.99k
14.01k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
12.42k
21.17k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.21k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.73k
11.42k (x1.99)
TOTAL
36.19k
51.82k (x1.43)

Multithread

i7-3770K

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.36k
82.38k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
55.16k
115.64k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.31k
32.22k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.05k
3.71k (x0.73)
TOTAL
133.88k
233.94k (x1.75)

Performance/W
i7-3770K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
654 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
716 points/W
3304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
921 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
6684 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3770K
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3331 points/GHz
3687 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3186 points/GHz
5571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1292 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1470 points/GHz
3005 points/GHz
TOTAL
9280 points/GHz
13636 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4