Core i7-3770 vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
Both models i7-3770 and E5-1620 v2 are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306e4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
77 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
April 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
34.59k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.7k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
12.55k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.11k
12.14k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.83k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
4.85k (x0.92)
TOTAL
34.59k
34.37k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-3770
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
49.56k
51.93k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
56.21k
56.7k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.17k
23.81k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
12.14k (x2.11)
TOTAL
133.7k
144.57k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i7-3770
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
644 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
730 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
1736 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3770
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3104 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
8870 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4