Core i7-3770 vs i7-10750H
Description
The i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0652
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
77 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.59k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.7k points
349.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
16.71k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
12.11k
25.45k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.06k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
13.2k (x2.51)
TOTAL
34.59k
61.43k (x1.78)
Multithread
i7-3770
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
49.56k
67.59k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
56.21k
111.94k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.17k
27.7k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.3k (x0.92)
TOTAL
133.7k
212.53k (x1.59)
Performance/W
i7-3770
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
644 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
730 points/W
2487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
1736 points/W
4723 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3770
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3342 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3104 points/GHz
5091 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
TOTAL
8870 points/GHz
12285 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4