Core i7-2640M vs i5-10300H
Description
The i7-2640M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0652
Core
Sandy Bridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
PGA 988B
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.86k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.86k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2640M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.63k
15.65k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
8.33k
23.13k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
5.66k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
11.43k (x2.99)
TOTAL
25.86k
55.87k (x2.16)
Multithread
i7-2640M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.22k
26.77k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
43.81k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
10.17k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
11.91k (x3.03)
TOTAL
54.86k
92.66k (x1.69)
Performance/W
i7-2640M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
560 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
1567 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-2640M
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1165 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1092 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
7390 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4