Core i7-2640M vs i3-10100T
Description
The i7-2640M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the i3-10100T gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.2 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the i3-10100T gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.2 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
PGA 988B
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.86k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.86k points
227.67k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2640M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.63k
13.88k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
8.33k
20.94k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
5.18k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
8.2k (x2.15)
TOTAL
25.86k
48.19k (x1.86)
Multithread
i7-2640M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.22k
54.88k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
93.17k (x4.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
23.34k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
3.85k (x0.98)
TOTAL
54.86k
175.24k (x3.19)
Performance/W
i7-2640M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
560 points/W
1433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
1567 points/W
2696 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-2640M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
3228 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
4869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1165 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1092 points/GHz
1907 points/GHz
TOTAL
7390 points/GHz
11208 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4