| | | | | | |

Core i7-2600 vs i5-3337U


Description
The i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2600 gets a score of 93.7 k points while the i5-3337U gets 48.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-2600 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306a9
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /2
TDP
95 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2011
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
28.68k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.69k points
48.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2600
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.03k
8.64k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
8.91k
8.55k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
3.42k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
3.22k (x0.59)
TOTAL
28.68k
23.82k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-2600

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.69k
17.28k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
34.22k
19.67k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.65k
7.59k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.13k
3.75k (x0.91)
TOTAL
93.69k
48.3k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i7-2600
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
397 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
360 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
186 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
43 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
986 points/W
2841 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-2600
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
2639 points/GHz
3201 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2343 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1425 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
7549 points/GHz
8824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4