| | | | | | |

Core i7-14700KF vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
The i7-14700KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-14700KF gets a score of 1561.9 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-14700KF is 3.6 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a20f12
Core
Raptor Lake-R
Vermeer
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
20/28
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/12x64+8x48/12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
33792 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2023
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
127.64k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1561.88k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-14700KF
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
57.7k
22.73k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
32.63k
24.59k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.61k
11.44k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.7k
25.03k (x1.27)
TOTAL
127.64k
83.79k (x0.66)

Multithread

i7-14700KF

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
700.72k
134.28k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
538.15k
178.56k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
269.22k
78.16k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
53.8k
38.26k (x0.71)
TOTAL
1561.88k
429.25k (x0.27)

Performance/W
i7-14700KF
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4305 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2154 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
12495 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-14700KF
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
10303 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3145 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3518 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
22793 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4