| | | | | | |

Core i7-14700KF vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The i7-14700KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-14700KF gets a score of 1561.9 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-14700KF is 4.2 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-R
Matisse
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
20/28
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/12x64+8x48/12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
33792 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2023
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
127.64k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
1561.88k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-14700KF
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.7k
15.48k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
32.63k
22.91k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.61k
7.1k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.7k
21.11k (x1.07)
TOTAL
127.64k
66.61k (x0.52)

Multithread

i7-14700KF

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
700.72k
90.39k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
538.15k
139.1k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
269.22k
53.2k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
53.8k
90.92k (x1.69)
TOTAL
1561.88k
373.61k (x0.24)

Performance/W
i7-14700KF
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4305 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2154 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
12495 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-14700KF
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
10303 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3145 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3518 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
22793 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4